Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 05:44
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Subway owner buys popular chicken chain in $1 billion deal - PennLive.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Do any other guys like to eat cum of another man from their wife's pussy?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Miley Cyrus Recalls How She Used to 'Hide' Drug Spending From Her Accountant - TooFab
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
What is the best true Hollywood story you know?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do I become a Buddhist, and can someone explain Buddhism to me?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Joey Chestnut, barred last July, returns to Nathan’s hot dog eating contest - The Washington Post